Watch TV and you’ll see Ozempic is presented as a “miracle drug” to help with weight loss. But it's important to slow down and ask more questions. In this episode of David v. Goliath, Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe welcome seasoned trial attorney Marcus Susen of Susen Law Group to the show. The conversation delves into the complexities of the Ozempic and Paragard lawsuits, highlighting Marcus’s tenacity and his relentless pursuit for justice on behalf of affected patients. This discussion serves as a stark reminder of the importance of asking questions when it comes to health-related decisions.If you're interested in pursuing a case against Ozempic, Mounjaro, Wegovy, Rybelsus, and Trulicity, you can contact attorney Marcus Susen via email at marcus@susenlawgroup.com. Learn More and Connect☑️ Marcus Susen | LinkedIn ☑️ Susen Law Group | Facebook ☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Matt Dolman | LinkedIn☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm personal attention.

Recovering addicts are a socially marginalized group. Some recovering from opiate addiction have relied on Suboxone sublingual strips to help aid their recovery. However, Suboxone sublingual strips have been linked to tooth decay and other dental problems.In this episode of David v. Goliath, Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe of Dolman Law Group discuss ongoing developments in the Suboxone tooth decay/tooth loss lawsuit. Specifically, Matt and Stan discuss what’s needed to make a claim. To learn more about the Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit, listen to a prior podcast episode and visit Dolman Law Group’s resource website, Lawsuit Legal News. To learn more about Dolman Law Group, visit the firm’s website or call 833-552-7274.Learn More and Connect☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Matt Dolman | LinkedIn☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm personal attention.

Many baby food brands have been shown to contain unacceptably high amounts of lead, arsenic, and other dangerous heavy metals. But how does a parent know whether toxic baby food may be linked to their child’s neurodevelopmental disorder, like autism?In this episode of David v. Goliath, Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe of Dolman Law Group discuss ongoing developments in toxic baby food litigation. Specifically, Matt and Stan discuss challenges to succeeding on toxic baby food claims and provide resources such as Lawsuit Legal News where parents can learn more about ongoing toxic baby food litigation developments.To learn more about Dolman Law Group and how their team is handling toxic baby food claims, visit the firm’s website, call 833-552-7274, or email Attorney Matt Dolman.Learn More and Connect☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Matt Dolman | LinkedIn☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm personal attention.

Certain cow-based milk formulas can be dangerous to premature babies. There’s a significant percentage of babies that suffer from NEC, a severe condition with a 50-50 mortality rate, after drinking the formulas. There’s ongoing litigation against the makers of these formulas as a result.In this episode of David vs. Goliath, host Matt Dolman welcomes Brett Turnbull, a top trial attorney, to discuss the NEC Baby Formula litigation. Brett talks about the current status of the litigation and case criteria. Additionally, Matt and Brett touch on the AFFF firefighting foam litigation. This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in learning how lawyers like Brett are fighting for the well-being of individuals and families affected by these issues. To learn more about Attorney Brett Turnbull and his team, please visit the law firm’s website or call 205-831-5040.Learn More and Connect☑️ Brett Turnbull | LinkedIn | Facebook☑️ Turnbull, Holcomb & LeMoine, PC | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube | LinkedIn☑️ Matt Dolman | LinkedIn☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case....

Did you undergo in vitro fertilization during early November to mid-December of 2023? If that process failed, you may have been a victim of the contaminated in vitro fertilization solution manufactured by CooperSurgical.In this episode of David vs. Goliath, host Stan Gipe welcomes trial attorney Michael Rose to discuss the issues with CooperSurgical's in vitro fertilization (IVF) product and the impact on couples and families.The defective product, a solution used in the IVF process, led to failed fertilization. The emotional distress and non-economic damages caused by the loss of the opportunity to have children are immeasurable. Fertility clinics may also be held responsible if they were aware of the defective product and continued to use it. Potential victims are encouraged to obtain their medical records and seek legal action to hold CooperSurgical accountable and potentially receive compensation.If you think you may have experienced embryo loss from a CooperSurgical solution, contact the experienced IVF contamination lawsuit attorneys at Hach & Rose, LLP by phone at 866-LAWSUSA or 212-779-0057 or by email at info@hachroselaw.com. Learn More and Connect☑️ Michael Rose | LinkedIn☑️ Hach & Rose, LLP | LinkedIn | YouTube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter/X☑️ Stan Gipe | Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does...

The surge in popularity of Ozempic, and similar drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro, has skyrocketed. But it isn’t just the monetary price tag that’s high. Along with the seemingly magic weight loss, comes a host of reports of medical problems. In this episode of David v. Goliath, hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe discuss claims involving Ozempic. Originally designed for individuals with type 2 diabetes, Ozempic has taken off for its off-label use as a weight loss medication. However, there’s been a recent slew of claims from people using Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs involving negative side effects and other health issues from vomiting and incontinence to intestinal blockage and stomach paralysis, some of which require surgical intervention.Tune in to hear Matt and Stan talk about the latest developments in the weight-loss drug craze and the resulting wave of litigation. Visit the Dolman Law Group website for more information on the Ozempic gallbladder lawsuit and the Ozempic stomach paralysis lawsuit.  Learn More and Connect☑️ Matt Dolman | LinkedIn☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTube☑️ Additional Information: New Study Finds Direct Link Between Ozempic and GastroparesisThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident...

Someone who is recovering from drug addiction is trying to get back on their feet.  But what if the medication that is supposed to help is causing problems? In this episode of David v. Goliath, hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe discuss the newest emerging mass tort relating to the use of Suboxone, a medication commonly prescribed to individuals with opioid addiction to help them get off of opiates. Recent findings show that the sublingual film version of Suboxone is acidic and causes the degradation of the protective outer layer of teeth and tooth enamel. This can have a cataclysmic effect on people’s lives, and even impact their ability to find employment. There's currently a group of about 40 lawsuits in different districts throughout the United States that are likely to be consolidated over the next few weeks into multidistrict litigation (MDL). The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) meets on January 25th and a steering committee will be selected by late February. In the meantime, anyone who has experienced dental problems while taking Suboxone before 2022, may be able to recover compensation and should contact a reputable attorney. For more information on the Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit, visit the Dolman Law Group website.Learn More and Connect☑️ Matt Dolman | LinkedIn☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTubeThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm personal attention.

The information we currently know about the brain is just the tip of the iceberg. This fact, along with the complex nature of brain injuries, makes trying traumatic brain injury cases especially challenging.  In this episode of David v. Goliath, host Stan Gipe is joined by Keith Fuicelli, founding partner of the Colorado personal injury law firm, Fuicelli & Lee. Keith is an attorney who represents clients in a variety of accident and injury cases, including traumatic brain injury and concussion, which is the focus of this discussion.As a survivor of a traumatic brain injury, Keith’s experience provides him with a unique perspective that enables him to relate and empathize with clients who have experienced an accident and life-changing injuries. Tune in to hear Keith’s story, the brain injury case he recently handled, and his approach to dealing with things such as poor-quality medical records, the subjective nature of concussions, physician testimony, and verdicts awarded to clients with positive versus negative medical outlooks.Learn More and Connect☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn☑️ Fuicelli & Lee, P.C. | LinkedIn | YouTube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter/X☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTubeThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does...

Safety certifications ensure that products have undergone rigorous testing. This is especially important when it comes to children’s products. However, not all products are subject to the same vetting process, if at all.In this episode of David v. Goliath, host Stan Gipe is joined by Ed Ciarimboli, an attorney who specializes in products liability cases as they relate to children's products. With Christmas fast approaching, and gift shopping in full swing, this is a very timely topic. Tune in to hear Stan and Ed discuss important safety concerns relating to children’s products, including issues relating to online retailers, third-party manufacturers, and foreign-based e-commerce websites. Stan and Ed also offer useful information on how to better ensure that you make the safest purchases possible. Learn More and Connect☑️ Ed Ciarimboli | LinkedIn ☑️ Fellerman & Ciarimboli Law PC | Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn | YouTube☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTubeThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm personal...

Moving from military life to civilian life can be difficult, especially if a veteran is dealing with a service-connected injury. Resources are available to ease the transition, but in typical government fashion, obtaining VA disability benefits often involves a maze of rules, intricate procedures, and bureaucratic red tape.In this episode of David v. Goliath, hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe are joined by Michael Hoffman, a VA Accredited Attorney who practices veteran’s disability benefits law. Michael knows firsthand what it’s like to sustain a service-connected injury and then navigate the complicated VA process to get disability benefits. Michael explains what motivated him to get into veterans’ disability law, how it differs from general disability, and why persistence is key to unlocking a maximum disability rating. He also talks about those who prey on injured veterans and the importance of choosing a VA Accredited Attorney. Learn More and Connect☑️ Michael Hoffman | Werner, Hoffman & Greig | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube☑️ Matt Dolman | Twitter | LinkedIn☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTubeEpisode Snapshot  As an injured veteran, Michael has directly experienced the challenge of VA disability claimsCan a client qualify for both a VA disability claim and a general disability claim?The advantage of engaging a VA disability attorney early in the claims process How veteran compensation works for mental...

No one wonders how to get an attorney if they get into an auto accident, but when someone has a business contract issue and can’t afford to litigate, it can feel like the walls are closing in.In this episode of David v. Goliath, hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe are joined by Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania litigator Brendan Lupetin. Brendan discusses his experiences in both medical malpractice and business litigation, going in depth on contingency fees in these types of cases as well as how to choose which cases to take. Brendan also recounts courtroom successes he has had and how he started taking on business litigation cases. Tune in for a fascinating discussion of an underserved practice area and some tips when working these types of cases.Learn More and Connect☑️ Brendan Lupetin | Lupetin & Unatin, LLC | LinkedIn ☑️ Matt Dolman | Twitter | LinkedIn☑️ Stan Gipe☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTubeEpisode Snapshot  Taking on business litigation cases as a personal injury attorney.How medical malpractice cases and business litigation cases are similar.Deciding whether to take on a business litigation case on a contingency fee basis.Researching a case before taking it on.Limiting the amount of contingency fee cases you take on.Overcoming the hurdle in medical malpractice litigation.The insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The...

“Our inventory means nothing to a bank.” Banks won’t lend money for personal injury or other single-event cases, so lawyers and clients need to secure funding elsewhere.In this episode of The David vs. Goliath Podcast, host Matt Dolman welcomes Casey Gard, the managing partner of Gard Family Office LLC, a litigation finance firm focusing on high-value personal injury litigation. By funding litigation–including hiring expert witnesses and covering medical bills–investment firms like Casey’s provide greater access to the court system and hold insurance companies accountable to plaintiffs suffering catastrophic injuries.Learn More and Connect☑️ Casey Gard☑️ Matt Dolman | Twitter | LinkedIn☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTubeEpisode Snapshot  How does Casey decide which cases to fund?Is litigation finance influenced by “social inflation”?Litigation finance actually increases the value of a case.What happens when there is a meritorious case but a law firm can’t bankroll it and banks won’t lend the firm money?Cases in the hands of attorneys who have trial experience have increased value.Managing the peaks and valleys of business is key–you’re never as dumb as you feel in the valleys and you’re never as smart as you feel at the peaks.What’s the difference between a hedge fund and a family office?Third-party funding is here to stay.The insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm personal attention.

How can an attorney fund a case? When a personal injury attorney files suit against an insurance company giant, they often don’t have the same resources as the companies they are going up against. However, private equity gives these attorneys the power to level the playing field.There are ethical considerations though. Who controls the case? Does the lawyer listen to their client or the lender? Although the lender is giving the money, “any lawyer worth his weight in salt is going to take control of the case”. And the lender, in turn, wants the attorney to act in the best interests of their case in order to succeed. In this episode of The David vs. Goliath Podcast, Anthony Russo Jr. of The Russo Firm joins hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe to discuss how private equity is helping personal injury attorneys take on Fortune 500 companies. Learn More and Connect☑️ Anthony Russo Jr. | The Russo Firm | LinkedIn☑️ Matt Dolman | Twitter | LinkedIn  ☑️ Stan Gipe ☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTubeEpisode Snapshot  Private equity is entering the field of personal injury. Why it is difficult for attorneys to get funding from traditional financial institutions.How private equity entering the field of personal injury helps the consumer. Why mass tort financing is needed.How private equity levels the playing field. Though a lender may finance a case, the lawyer remains in charge.The insights and views presented in this podcast are for general...

“I think the general public has been bamboozled by this tort reform.” Contrary to popular belief, juries are not awarding unmerited “nuclear” verdicts in Florida, so recent tort reform legislation may be doing more harm than good.In this episode of The David vs. Goliath Podcast, hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe welcome Fort Lauderdale trial lawyer Anthony Russo Jr. to discuss the drawbacks of the recent tort reform legislation in Florida. Anthony, Matt, and Stan talk about the reality of tort practice in Florida and how so-called “tort reform” really affects plaintiffs seeking compensation for their damages.Learn More and Connect☑️ Anthony Russo Jr. | The Russo Firm | LinkedIn☑️ Matt Dolman | Twitter | LinkedIn  ☑️ Stan Gipe ☑️ Dolman Law Group☑️ Dolman Law Group on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | YouTubeEpisode Snapshot  How badly did Ron DeSantis hurt plaintiffs in Florida?Doesn’t tort reform prevent consumers from having access to the courts?The concept that juries are trying to give away money willy-nilly is a farce.What did the legislation really meddle with?  Hint: It’s not what actually leads to “nuclear” verdicts. Are insurance companies really losing money from these verdicts?Where do we see tort reform going?The insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided

The public often has a negative perception of attorneys, especially plaintiffs attorneys. What many don’t know is the crucial role plaintiffs attorneys play in championing the rights of everyday people, often against incredible odds.In this episode of The David vs. Goliath Podcast, Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe welcome Marcus Susen, of Susen Law Group, where they discuss the legal intricacies of mass tort cases, the challenges plaintiffs' attorneys face when taking on contingency fees, and the need for effective leadership structures to manage the claims of those impacted.Marcus also shares a compelling perspective on corporations' treatment in the legal system, the challenges faced by plaintiffs' attorneys, and the limitations of the FDA and the government when it comes to protecting consumers.In this episode: [01:14] Getting into leadership in the mass tort litigation space: Marcus shares how he started, the competition, and his journey to get to where he is today.[04:00] Mass tort case consolidation and leadership: What it means to be in leadership, the costs, risks involved, and case examples.[09:34] Hopes for quicker resolution of Camp Lejeune claims: The Navy is urged to settle a large number of claims related to the Camp Lejeune injuries.[16:46] Vapor study from ATSDR: Data from Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry could potentially support claims for additional injuries in the future.[19:02] Optimism about Camp Lejeune case serving as a model for other mass litigations: Marcus urges cooperation and data sharing to help resolve other similar cases.[19:41] AFFF and PFAS: Shedding light on the risks posed by these chemicals and their widespread presence in our lives.[21:51] Exploring litigation tracks and Bellwether cases: These cases involve the city of Stewart which holds significant implications for both municipalities and individual plaintiffs, setting the stage for potential settlements and shaping the future direction of the litigation. [24:35] Unveiling the AFFF Cases: They cover the number of cases, the upcoming bellwether trial, strength of scientific evidence and the impact of the chemicals to firefighters and military personnel. [27:44] Unmasking the forever chemicals sources: Understanding which companies are involved in its making and the truth about PFAS and their environmental impact. [33:41] Positive change through litigation: Explore the crucial role of plaintiffs attorneys in holding corporations accountable and ensuring consumer safety by initiating recalls and product liability lawsuits, shedding light on corporate wrongdoing. [35:01] FDA, big pharma, and medical device litigation: The questionable ties between FDA and Big Pharma as well as the complexities of medical device litigation, highlighting the Essure and Paragard cases as examples.The insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided...

Ever wondered how to combat the fake online reviews?In this episode of the David vs. Goliath Podcast, Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe welcome Curtis Boyd, founder of The Transparency Company, to discuss the power of online reviews and how his company is helping to combat illegitimate reviews.Curtis explains the different types of fake reviews, how businesses can be negatively impacted by them, the process of identifying and addressing fake negative reviews, and disputing fake positive reviews. He also discusses the need for better moderation and verification systems and the challenges of getting big tech companies like Google to address fake reviews.In this episode: [00:42] Reviews are Prominent Factors in Google's Algorithm: Reviews play a significant role in Google's algorithm, and it’s important to understand their impact on local rankings.[01:25] The Transparency Company's Approach to Identifying Fake Reviews: Curtis explains their work in building algorithms, software, and AI to detect false online reviews, targeting accounts that violate Google's terms of service.[02:46] Identifying Red Flags in Reviews: The Transparency Company uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) to identify authorship styles, duplicate content, and reviewer networks as red flags to indicate fake reviews.[07:21] The Challenges of Addressing False Negative Reviews: The challenges of identifying false negative reviews and how The Transparency Company seeks previously purchased fake positive reviews to narrow down potential sources of false negatives.[12:35] Behind the Veil of Fake Reviews: The incentives behind fake reviews, the impact of fake reviews on consumer trust, and the difficulty of getting Google to take action.[18:26] Moderation Challenges: The process of exposing and disputing bogus five-star reviews, the importance of maintaining consumer trust, and the challenges associated with persuading platforms like Google and the Better Business Bureau to act.[19:52] The Growth of The Transparency Company: The company’s exponential growth highlights the urgency of distinguishing authentic businesses from those bolstered by deceitful ratings.[23:19] Google’s Hostility to Authenticating Reviews: Google recently removed a review-athenticating Chrome extension built by The Transparency Company.🔑 Relevant Resources 🔑Connect with Curtis: LinkedIn | The Transparency CompanyKubernetesThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm...

In this week’s episode, hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe discuss that changes to Florida's insurance laws primarily benefit insurance companies at the expense of consumers. The legislation was criticized for allowing companies to escape corporate negligence and shifting the burden to consumers and businesses.The bill was sold as a benefit to consumers despite lacking language that would lead to reduced insurance premiums. Rather, the new legislation shifts money from consumers to insurance companies without providing any benefit to consumers, while insurance companies continue to welcome record-setting profits.In this episode: [01:01] Escaping corporate negligence: The new law allows insurance companies to avoid being held liable for mistakes, shifting the burden onto consumers and businesses. [07:12] Pressure to settle claims: The legislation makes it more difficult for consumers and businesses to pressure insurance companies to settle claims quickly and fairly.[09:22] Nuclear verdicts: Framed as excessively high jury awards, nuclear verdicts are not driven by the costs of future medical bills, they’re driven by pain and suffering, and the bill did nothing to curb recovery for pain and suffering.[10:16] Political motivation: Was the legislation pushed through as a political move to reward the insurance industry and attack the plaintiff bar? [12:24] Impact on injured individuals: How the new legislation leaves injured individuals at a disadvantage in settling claims with insurance companies.[15:42] No reduced premiums: The legislation lacks language that would lead to reduced insurance premiums for consumers.💡 Meet Your Hosts 💡Name: Matthew A. Dolman, Esq.Title: Partner at Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PASpecialty: Matt is a nationally recognized insurance and personal injury attorney and focuses much of his practice on the litigation of catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases throughout Florida. Connect: LinkedIn | Twitter | InstagramName: Stanley Gipe, Esq.Title: Partner and Head of Litigation at Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PASpecialty: Stan is a Florida Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer. This distinction connotes expertise in the discipline of trial practice. He has served as lead counsel on over 1,000 Florida personal injury lawsuits.The insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm personal attention.

In this week’s episode, hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe share valuable insights into navigating the complexities of tort law and insurance coverage. We discuss the distinctions between intentional torts and negligence, focusing on the insurance coverage implications for each. Intentional torts occur when someone purposely causes harm. Negligence arises from unintentional harm due to careless actions.Florida law doesn’t provide insurance coverage for intentional acts, making it vital for attorneys to identify and correctly present cases involving underlying negligence. We delve into specific case types, such as negligent transmission of sexual disease and security cases.Matt and Stan share examples of how framing cases strategically can result in insurance coverage even when harm may initially seem intentional. It’s essential to have a skilled attorney who can present a case in a way that triggers insurance coverage. Most people don’t have sufficient liquid assets to cover large claims. It’s also essential to seek a second opinion if you've been told you don't have a case. Different attorneys may have varying perspectives on case approaches and the ability to identify negligence in seemingly intentional acts.In this episode: [00.36] The differences between intentional torts and negligence[01.43] Florida's insurance coverage policy on intentional acts[04.39] Insurance coverage in specific cases, such as negligent security cases[05.58] How testimony from criminal cases can sometimes benefit civil claims[09.53] The importance of framing cases correctly for insurance coverage[11.14] Pursuing insurance coverage over individual assets[15.41] Why you should consider seeking a second opinion if you’ve been told you don’t have a case💡 Meet Your Hosts 💡Name: Matthew A. Dolman, Esq.Title: Partner at Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PASpecialty: Matt is a nationally recognized insurance and personal injury attorney and focuses much of his practice on the litigation of catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases throughout Florida. Connect: LinkedIn | Twitter | InstagramName: Stanley Gipe, Esq.Title: Partner and Head of Litigation at Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PASpecialty: Stan is a Florida Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer. This distinction connotes expertise in the discipline of trial practice. He has served as lead counsel on over 1,000 Florida personal injury lawsuits.The insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion of this podcast should not be understood as a promise of any particular result in a future case. Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers: Big firm results, small firm personal attention.

Florida's HB 837, the new tort reform bill signed by Governor DeSantis, contains sweeping limits on lawsuits and is likely to have detrimental consequences for accident and injury victims in Florida. While it may appear reasonable to those outside the legal profession, Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe are here to debunk common misconceptions and reveal the true impact of this bill on accident victims in Florida.Initially aimed at addressing nuclear verdicts (which are quite rare), the bill has evolved to create chaos in areas such as doctors' fees in personal injury cases, negligent security standards, and the ability to pursue minor claims, among others. Furthermore, the bill favors insurance companies by forcing citizens to cover attorney fees, enabling these companies to manipulate the law and profit from countless claims. Join hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe in this episode as they delve into the detrimental implications of the new tort reform bill and what it means for you. They examine each amendment in detail, explain how they directly impact Florida residents, and highlight the overarching issues associated with Florida's tort reform bill.In this episode: [00:27] An overview of the changes included in Florida’s tort reform bill, HB 837[02:25] How the bill will negatively impact the healthcare treatment personal injury victims receive[04:35] Exploring the implications of a letter of protection[06:55] The problems arising from introducing Medicare rates in personal injury cases[08:46] The misguided effort to eliminate nuclear verdicts – how the HB 837 falls short[12:59] Why uninsured and underinsured drivers are far more expensive for Florida citizens than lawsuit verdicts[16:01] How HB 837 really hurts the people of Florida[23:47] Understanding the 51% standard and the challenges it presents for accident injury victims[27:55] The major problem with the HB 837 tort reform bill: the people drafting and voting on these laws often lack industry-specific expertise and, as a result, may not fully grasp the implications of their decisions.💡 Meet Your Hosts 💡Name: Matthew A. Dolman, Esq.Title: Partner at Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PASpecialty: Matt is a nationally recognized insurance and personal injury attorney and focuses much of his practice on the litigation of catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases throughout Florida. Connect: LinkedIn | Twitter | InstagramName: Stanley Gipe, Esq.Title: Partner and Head of Litigation at Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PASpecialty: Stan is a Florida Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer. This distinction connotes expertise in the discipline of trial practice. He has served as lead counsel on over 1,000 Florida personal injury lawsuits.The insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information presented is not a substitute for consulting with an attorney. Nor does tuning in to this podcast constitute an attorney-client relationship of any kind. Any case result information provided on any portion

The landscape of legal marketing is evolving rapidly. You can no longer rely solely on word-of-mouth referrals if you want to scale your practice. How do you craft a legal marketing strategy that targets your specific audience?Invest in the areas where your potential clients are. In 2023, this means putting your marketing dollars into social media. This is an essential step to connecting with others, getting in front of potential clients, and staying top-of-mind in a competitive market.In this episode, show hosts Matt Dolman and Stan Gipe sit down with Larry Nussbaum, attorney and President of Altman Nussbaum Shunnarah, to talk about effective legal marketing in today’s world. Larry divulges strategies for maintaining relationships, utilizing social media for business, and choosing to be authentic in a changing world. Larry also shares his thoughts on the future of legal marketing and social media and the marketing frameworks his team is working on now. In this episode: [00:31] Stan Gipe and Matt Dolman welcome today’s guest, attorney Larry Nussbaum[01:51] The evolution of Larry’s marketing strategy[04:07] Personal referrals remain impactful; however, social media marketing has become crucial in the contemporary legal marketing landscape.[08:04] Tips to maintain client and referral relationships[11:26] Larry's insights on the legal profession's future and advice for today's law school graduates[13:59] Leveraging social media to benefit your business[21:23] Marketing strategies Larry and his team are focusing on[24:37] Envisioning the future of online advertising and marketing💡 Featured Guest 💡Name: Larry NussbaumTitle: President and Attorney at Altman Nussbaum ShunnarahSpecialty: Larry Nussbaum is a Boston-based attorney and the President of Altman Nussbaum Shunnarah. He has been named by National Trial Lawyers as one of the top 100 trial lawyers in 2018, earned recognition from Super Lawyers, and earned a perfect score on AVVO, which named him as one of Boston’s top law firms. Connect: LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | TikTok💡 Meet Your Hosts 💡Name: Matthew A. Dolman, Esq.Title: Partner at Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PAConnect: LinkedIn | Twitter | Instagram Name: Stanley Gipe, Esq.Title: Partner and Head of Litigation at Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PAThe insights and views presented in this podcast are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any...